Technology and your Case
The use of technology in personal injury cases is becoming more common every day." We have seen how social media can affect your case in a previous post" How Social Networking Can Affect Your Case; but it goes far beyond that." New features and enhancements in vehicles, phones and other commonly used machines are now acting as a digital witness that can either refute or corroborate your version of events. Here we take a look at a case (Kelly v. Perth) that dealt with this issue specifically, and a judgment which took into consideration evidence obtained from a Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking device. Ms. Stephanie Kelly was involved in a" motor vehicular accident" where her vehicle left the road and collided with a tree in April of 2009." She has no memory of the accident or details leading up to it so the events were pieced together by eye witnesses on the scene. According to Mr. Brad McIntosh who was traveling on the same road that day, he saw two vehicles driving in the same direction toward him at an arguably quick speed for the weather conditions at the time." He estimated snow fall of about ten inches along the long stretch of road and could see the imprints of tire tracks on either side of the road." It was also very windy." With the approach of the two vehicles, he slowed his truck to a stop, noticing quite a bit of snow coming off the back of each vehicle. The first vehicle drove past him but the second vehicle lost traction and begun to swerve out of control when it reached the area with the deepest drift, leaving the roadway and hitting a tree. Mr. Jody Catalan who came across the same long stretch of roadway noticed that while the weather conditions at that time were windy but fine, there was snowfall of between eight to twelve inches high, for about fifty yards along the roadway." After reducing his speed, he experienced a little bit of difficulty as he drove through the highest point of snow, not seeing any previous tire tracks to use for traction. Some moments later in passing, he came across a stationary transport vehicle on the road and another vehicle in a field to his right." He assumed that the accident had happened some time ago, but noticed an arm sticking out of the driver side window of the car in the field." He turned his vehicle around and went to see if he could help the driver in the car. Another gentleman, while not witness to the accident, was travelling the same length of highway when he lost control of the vehicle on the snow covered roadway and ended up on the lawn of a private residence. The responding officer, Sergeant Van Essen's assessment of the area was that the six to eight inch height of snow stretched one to two hundred feet along the roadway." He saw that the drift was wet below and had packed snow at the top. Constable Susan Blacklock was another responding officer to the Kelly accident scene." According to her report, there was a strong northern wind with snow blowing." To the east of the accident location, it was wet and bare but had heavy drifting to the west." She did not take a measurement of the length or depth of the snow on the roadway. Upon inspection of Ms. Kelly's car, she saw that the vehicle had good tread snow tires." She concluded from what she saw on the under carriage that it had hit a stump which caused the car to go airborne and roll." The driver's side made contact with the trunk of tree, quite a height above the ground and was heavily damaged. Ms. Kelly had to be cut out of the vehicle and was unconscious when she arrived at the hospital." She had multiple, life threatening injuries. According to the Municipal Act 2001, the maintenance and upkeep of the roadway needs to be in a reasonable state of repair otherwise the municipality would be held liable for any injuries sustained by anyone under the Negligence Act. This can be waived if it is found that
- reasonable steps were taken to prevent such an issue
- if it is within reason that they could not have known about the condition of the roadway
- the minimum requirements of upkeep were met at the time of the incident
- the County did not keep the roadway in a "reasonable state of repair"
- the accident was a direct result of the state of the roadway
Subscribe to our Newsletter